处理软引用和弱引用时遇到问题.代码有一个可以切换的标志
软引用和弱引用之间的所有逻辑.虽然看起来很弱,所以似乎都是
为了工作正常,使用软引用我一直得到OutOfMemoryError.
这种情况发生在MacOSX上的JDK7和JDK6以及Debian上的IcedTea6.
但是,带有G1收集器的JDK7是我发现使用软引用的设置,
我试过的其他一切(串行/并行GC,-client / -server等)都失败了
例外.
软引用和弱引用之间的所有逻辑.虽然看起来很弱,所以似乎都是
为了工作正常,使用软引用我一直得到OutOfMemoryError.
这种情况发生在MacOSX上的JDK7和JDK6以及Debian上的IcedTea6.
但是,带有G1收集器的JDK7是我发现使用软引用的设置,
我试过的其他一切(串行/并行GC,-client / -server等)都失败了
例外.
代码有点大,但我试图在保留问题的同时尽量缩小代码.
我在其上面留下了一个大量的评论,更详细地描述了如何重现
问题.
/* * * Leakling.java * * * Issue: * * * This code throws OutOfMemoryError when using soft references,whereas weak references * work ok. Moreover,with JDK7 G1 garbage collector soft references work as well. Other * collectors seem to fail. Code was tested with MacOSX 10.8.2 JDKs 1.7.0_10-b18 and * 1.6.0_37-b06-434-11M3909,with Debian 6.0 IcedTea6 1.8.13. * VarIoUs command line options including -Xmx,-client/-server,-XX:+UseParallelOldGC,* -XX:+UseSerialGC were tested. * * * Examples: * * * 1. Default options,weak references,this works,counters go up and down,* but everything keeps going just as expected: * * java -Xmx50m Leakling \ * --loop-delay=10 --min-chunk-size=1000 --max-chunk-size=100000 --use-soft-references=false * * * 2. Default options,soft references,this eventually throws the exception: * * java -Xmx50m Leakling \ * --loop-delay=10 --min-chunk-size=1000 --max-chunk-size=100000 --use-soft-references=true * * * 3. G1 collector (IcedTea6 doesn't support it),but it did anyway: * * java -XX:+UseG1GC -Xmx50m Leakling \ * --loop-delay=10 --min-chunk-size=1000 --max-chunk-size=100000 --use-soft-references=false * * * 4. G1 collector,this works with JDK7. * JDK6 seems to just stop after having hit memory limit (with no message whatsoever). * * java -XX:+UseG1GC -Xmx50m Leakling \ * --loop-delay=10 --min-chunk-size=1000 --max-chunk-size=100000 --use-soft-references=true * * * jarek,02.01.2013 * * */ import java.lang.ref.*; import java.util.*; public class Leakling { private static final String TAG = "memory-chunk-"; class Chunk { final String name; final int size; final private byte[] mem; Chunk(String name,int minSize,int maxSize,Random randomizer) { int currSize = minSize; if (maxSize > minSize) { currSize += randomizer.nextInt(maxSize - minSize + 1); } this.size = currSize; this.mem = new byte[currSize]; this.name = name; log(this + " has been created (" + currSize + " bytes)"); } @Override public void finalize() throws Throwable { log(this + " is finalizing"); } @Override public String toString() { return name + " of " + getReadableMemorySize(size); } } class WeakChunk extends WeakReference<Chunk> { final String name; public WeakChunk(Chunk chunk,ReferenceQueue<Chunk> queue) { super(chunk,queue); this.name = chunk.name; } @Override public String toString() { return "weak reference of " + name + " is " + ((get() == null) ? "null" : "alive"); } } class SoftChunk extends SoftReference<Chunk> { final String name; public SoftChunk(Chunk chunk,queue); this.name = chunk.name; } @Override public String toString() { return "soft reference of " + name + " is " + ((get() == null) ? "null" : "alive"); } } // Logging as implemented here gives extra timing info (secs.milis starting from the initialization). private final long start = System.currentTimeMillis(); private final Formatter formatter = new Formatter(System.err); private final String formatString = "%1$d.%2$03d %3$s\n"; // I found this be better synchronized... synchronized void log(Object o) { long curr = System.currentTimeMillis(); long diff = curr - start; formatter.format(formatString,(int) (diff / 1000),(int) (diff % 1000),o.toString()); } private final ArrayList<Chunk> allChunks = new ArrayList<Chunk>(); private final ReferenceQueue<Chunk> softReferences = new ReferenceQueue<Chunk>(); private final ReferenceQueue<Chunk> weakReferences = new ReferenceQueue<Chunk>(); private final HashSet<Reference<Chunk>> allReferences = new HashSet<Reference<Chunk>>(); private final Random randomizer = new Random(); private int loopDelay = 200; private int minChunkSize = 100; private int maxChunkSize = 1000; private int chunkCounter = 0; private boolean useSoftReferences = false; private long minMemory = 10 * 1024 * 1024; // Default range is 10-30MB private long maxMemory = 3 * minMemory; private long usedMemory = 0; private String getReadableMemorySize(long size) { if (size >= 1024 * 1024) { return (float) (Math.round((((float) size) / 1024f / 1024f) * 10f)) / 10f + "MB"; } if (size >= 1024) { return (float) (Math.round((((float) size) / 1024f) * 10f)) / 10f + "kB"; } else if (size > 0) { return size + "B"; } else { return "0"; } } private void allocMem() { Chunk chunk = new Chunk(TAG + chunkCounter++,minChunkSize,maxChunkSize,randomizer); allChunks.add(chunk); Reference ref = useSoftReferences ? (new SoftChunk(chunk,softReferences)) : (new WeakChunk(chunk,weakReferences)); allReferences.add(ref); log(ref); usedMemory += chunk.size; } private void freeMem() { if (allChunks.size() < 1) { return; } int i = randomizer.nextInt(allChunks.size()); Chunk chunk = allChunks.get(i); log("freeing " + chunk); usedMemory -= chunk.size; allChunks.remove(i); } private int statMem() throws Exception { for (Reference ref; (ref = softReferences.poll()) != null;) { log(ref); allReferences.remove(ref); } for (Reference ref; (ref = weakReferences.poll()) != null;) { log(ref); allReferences.remove(ref); } int weakRefs = 0; int softRefs = 0; for (Iterator<Reference<Chunk>> i = allReferences.iterator(); i.hasNext();) { Reference<Chunk> ref = i.next(); if (ref.get() == null) { continue; } if (ref instanceof WeakChunk) { weakRefs++; } if (ref instanceof SoftChunk) { softRefs++; } } log(allChunks.size() + " chunks," + softRefs + " soft refs," + weakRefs + " weak refs," + getReadableMemorySize(usedMemory) + " used," + getReadableMemorySize(Runtime.getRuntime().freeMemory()) + " free," + getReadableMemorySize(Runtime.getRuntime().totalMemory()) + " total," + getReadableMemorySize(Runtime.getRuntime().maxMemory()) + " max"); if (loopDelay > 1) { Thread.sleep(loopDelay); } return (int)((100 * usedMemory) / maxMemory); // Return % of maxMemory being used. } public Leakling(String[] args) throws Exception { for (String arg : args) { if (arg.startsWith("--min-memory=")) { minMemory = Long.parseLong(arg.substring("--min-memory=".length())); } else if (arg.startsWith("--max-memory=")) { maxMemory = Long.parseLong(arg.substring("--max-memory=".length())); } else if (arg.startsWith("--min-chunk-size=")) { minChunkSize = Integer.parseInt(arg.substring("--min-chunk-size=".length())); } else if (arg.startsWith("--max-chunk-size=")) { maxChunkSize = Integer.parseInt(arg.substring("--max-chunk-size=".length())); } else if (arg.startsWith("--loop-delay=")) { loopDelay = Integer.parseInt(arg.substring("--loop-delay=".length())); } else if (arg.startsWith("--use-soft-references=")) { useSoftReferences = Boolean.parseBoolean(arg.substring("--use-soft-references=".length())); } else { throw new Exception("Unknown command line option..."); } } } public void run() throws Exception { log("Mem test started..."); while(true) { log("going up..."); do {// First loop allocates memory up to the given limit in a pseudo-random fashion. // Randomized rate of allocations/frees is about 4:1 as per the 10>=8 condition. if (randomizer.nextInt(10) >= 8) { freeMem(); } else { allocMem(); } } while (statMem() < 90); // Repeat until 90% of the given mem limit is hit... log("going down..."); do {// Now do the reverse. Frees are four times more likely than allocations are. if (randomizer.nextInt(10) < 8) { freeMem(); } else { allocMem(); } } while (usedMemory > minMemory); } } public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { (new Leakling(args)).run(); } }
解决方法
首先,不要混合使用参考文献的终结器.两者都会影响对象从内存中删除的速度,并且使用适当的引用类型可以更好地完成终结器所能完成的一切.
其次,正如我所提到的,可能存在与使用引用相关的gc延迟.至少对于“常见”gc算法,弱/软引用的对象可能在完全回收之前需要额外的gc运行.弱引用和软引用之间的本质区别在于弱引用是积极的gc,而软引用通常是“尽可能长”.这很可能是什么让你感到高兴.
当你使用弱引用对象运行时,东西会随着时间的推移被清理掉,让你避免使用OOME.
当您使用轻柔引用的对象运行时,将保持所有软引用的对象,直到您接近极限.然后,当内存变得紧张时,gc会尝试开始释放软引用的对象,但这需要太长时间(因为它可能需要多次gc传递以完全回收内存)并且最终得到一个OOME.
我只对G1 gc有肤浅的了解,所以我不知道为什么它在那个场景中“有效”.
总而言之,软引用很不错,但由于回收延迟,它们并不总能像你想要的那样好.另外,这是一个great article,还有一些额外的有用细节.