PostgreSQL嵌套CTE和UNION

前端之家收集整理的这篇文章主要介绍了PostgreSQL嵌套CTE和UNION前端之家小编觉得挺不错的,现在分享给大家,也给大家做个参考。
我正在尝试学习sql,使用Postgresql 9.1.3。我想了解一些令我震惊的行为是不一致的。以机智:

这样做:

WITH innermost AS (SELECT 2)
SELECT * FROM innermost
UNION SELECT 3;

我得到这个:

?column? 
----------
        2
        3

这样做:

WITH outmost AS (
        (WITH innermost AS (SELECT 2)
         SELECT * FROM innermost)
)                                
SELECT * FROM outmost;

结果:

?column? 
----------
        2

这也可以:

WITH outmost AS (
  SELECT 1
  UNION (WITH innermost AS (SELECT 2)
         SELECT * FROM innermost)
)
SELECT * FROM outmost;

我得到这个:

?column? 
----------
        1
        2

但这不行:

WITH outmost AS (
  SELECT 1
  UNION (WITH innermost as (SELECT 2)
         SELECT * FROM innermost
         UNION SELECT 3)
)
SELECT * FROM outmost;

结果:

ERROR:  relation "innermost" does not exist
LINE 4:          SELECT * FROM innermost

对于我的思维方式,最后一个应该成功,还有一个应该失败。我看不到图案。有没有一些一般规则,可以使我预测嵌套CTE和UNION的组合将会或不会起作用?

这个奥秘解决了:我所观察到的行为是一个已知的错误。我将相同的原始帖子发送到Postgresql特定的列表,并得到这个答案:

This is a bug :-(. The parse analysis code seems to think that WITH
can only be attached to the top level or a leaf-level SELECT within a
set operation tree; but the grammar follows the sql standard which
says no such thing. The WITH gets accepted,and attached to the
intermediate-level UNION which is where syntactically it should go,
and then it’s entirely ignored during parse analysis. Will see about
fixing it.

06000

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-novice/2012-07/msg00113.php

原文链接:https://www.f2er.com/postgresql/192913.html

猜你在找的Postgre SQL相关文章