用时分钟级别。
SELECT *
FROM (SELECT a1.*,rownum rn
FROM (SELECT openOrder2017.exchId,
............
openOrder2017.internalbizmark,
customer.typeIdList
FROM openOrder2017,customer
WHERE openOrder2017.custId = customer.custId
AND openOrder2017.orderTime >= 20170810000000
AND openOrder2017.orderTime <= 20170811235959
AND openOrder2017.branchId IN ('001100','001101')
AND openOrder2017.acctId IN ('##########')
AND openOrder2017.optLevel IN ('A0')
AND openOrder2017.custType IN
('A2','A9','A1','A4','A3')
ORDER BY orderTime,serialNum) a1
WHERE rownum <= 100) a2
WHERE rn >= 1;
其中:
openOrder2017表数据量360万条;
customer表数据量76条;
执行计划利用上了ACCTID索引,但是有大量的NESTED LOOPS,导致异常高的逻辑读。
将sql中的AND openOrder2017.acctId IN ('##########')条件取消,SQL查询速度反而变快了,但是走的是全表扫描方式。
突然醒悟,这是两个数据体量差距异常大的表,有严重的数据倾斜。通过openOrder2017.acctId索引访问,反而代价很大,择全表扫描的效率比选择索引要更高。
改造为:
FROM openOrder2017 left join customer on openOrder2017.custId = customer.custId
WHERE openOrder2017.orderTime >= 20170810000000
AND openOrder2017.orderTime <= 20170811235959
执行计划虽然走了全表扫描,但是执行效率大幅提升了。
原文链接:https://www.f2er.com/oracle/208085.html