我得到了一个包含92个布尔值的布尔列表,我希望将列表转换为字符串,我想我将取8个布尔值(位)并将它们放入字节(8位)然后使用ASCII将其转换为字节将值添加到字符串然后将字符添加到字符串.然而,经过超过2个小时的googeling,没有运气atm.我尝试将列表转换为字节列表但它没有工作^^.
String strbyte = null; for (int x = 0; x != tmpboolist.Count; x++) //tmpboolist is the 90+- boolean list { //this loop checks for true then puts a 1 or a 0 in the string(strbyte) if (tmpboolist[x]) { strbyte = strbyte + '1'; } else { strbyte = strbyte + '0'; } } //here I try to convert the string to a byte list but no success //no success because the testbytearray has the SAME size as the //tmpboolist(but it should have less since 8 booleans should be 1 Byte) //however all the 'Bytes' are 48 & 49 (which is 1 and 0 according to //http://www.asciitable.com/) Byte[] testbytearray = Encoding.Default.GetBytes(strbyte);
PS如果有人对如何编码和更好的建议有更好的建议将布尔列表解码为String?
(因为我希望人们用字符串分享他们的布尔列表,而不是90 1和0的列表.)
编辑:现在就开始了!所有的帮助
string text = new string(tmpboolist.Select(x => x ? '1' : '0').ToArray()); byte[] bytes = getBitwiseByteArray(text); //https://stackoverflow.com/a/6756231/1184013 String Arraycode = Convert.ToBase64String(bytes); System.Windows.MessageBox.Show(Arraycode); //first it makes a string out of the boolean list then it uses the converter to make it an Byte[](array),then we use the base64 encoding to make the byte[] a String.(that can be decoded later)
我稍后会查看encoding32,再次获取所有帮助的信息:)
解决方法
您应该将布尔值存储在
BitArray中.
var values = new BitArray(92); values[0] = false; values[1] = true; values[2] = true; ...
然后,您可以将BitArray转换为字节数组
var bytes = new byte[(values.Length + 7) / 8]; values.CopyTo(bytes);
和字节数组到Base64字符串
var result = Convert.ToBase64String(bytes);
相反,您可以将Base64字符串转换为字节数组
var bytes2 = Convert.FromBase64String(result);
和字节数组到BitArray
var values2 = new BitArray(bytes2);
Base64字符串如下所示:“Liwd7bRv6TMY2cNE”.这对于人们之间的分享来说可能有点不方便;看看human-oriented base-32 encoding:
Anticipated uses of these [base-32 strings] include cut-
and-paste,text editing (e.g. in HTML files),manual transcription via a
keyboard,manual transcription via pen-and-paper,vocal transcription over
phone or radio,etc.The desiderata for such an encoding are:
- minimizing transcription errors — e.g. the well-known problem of confusing
‘0’ with ‘O’- embedding into other structures — e.g. search engines,structured or
marked-up text,file systems,command shells- brevity — Shorter [strings] are better than longer ones.
- ergonomics — Human users (especially non-technical ones) should find the [strings] as easy and pleasant as possible. The uglier the [strings] looks,the worse.